Editor in Chief’s Note
In this issue, due
to end of the year of 1383 (2004) instead of editor in chief’s note,
this part allocates to the honored Head of Justice Administration of
Tehran so that as the previous years, he sets forth his spring
message of the year 1384 (2005) to the colleague.
____________________________________________________________________
A Selection of Latest Legal Approvals
Verdict No. 203 of General Board of Administrative Justice Court
regarding cancellation of Instruction No. 313 dated Sept. 20, 1994
of naval force of Islamic Revolution’s Guards Corps
Approval of 545th Session of Cultural Revolutionary
Supreme Council concerning possibility of study continuation of the
veiled Moslem girl students of universities of France, Germany and
Turkey in the Iranian Universities No. SH D/4007 dated Oct. 3, 2004
Cancellation of Articles 10 and 25 and Note 2 of Article 26, 27, 28,
30 and 31 of Executive By Law of Narcotics Law – Verdict No. 79 of
General Board of Administrative Justice Council regarding
cancellation of Articles of Executive By Law of Law for Amendment of
Law for Narcotics Control approved on Jan. 12, 1999 of Narcotics
Control Headquarters
Precedent verdict No. 670 dated Nov. 30, 2004 of General Board of
Supreme Court regarding election of the competent investigation
authority concerning fine of deduction of emptying of the goods
emptied in the Customs area by transporter.
Instruction of pardon of Afghan nationals
Instruction of imprisonment with service subject of Note of Article
11 of Law for Crimes Punishment of the Armed Forces approved on Dec.
30, 2003 of Islamic Consultative Assembly
Law for questioning Law of daily paid teachers employment based on
Law of Third Plan of Economic, Social and Cultural Development of
the Islamic Republic of Iran
Precedent verdict No. 671 of General Board of Supreme Court
regarding cancellation of writ of punishment suspension
Precedent verdict No. 672 dated Dec. 21, 2004 of General Board of
Supreme Court concerning dispossession
____________________________________________________________________
Disciplinary
Warnings
Judgment No. 148
dated July 5, 2004, drawn up by branch … of Judges’ Disciplinary
High Court:
Non-acquiring
opinion of expert regarding the fact that the plaintiff has not
determined the price of the relief precisely and requested for
expertise, is disciplinary violation.
Judgment No. 140 to 142 dated July 4, 2004, drawn up by branch …
of Judges’ Disciplinary High Court:
The wife’s Eddeh (legal period of abstention of a widow or divorcee
before her remarriage), which has not been determined in the
primitive judgment, and Court of Appeals has not considered to this
affair too, is proved and certain violation.
Judgment No. 154 to 155 dated June 25, 2004, drawn up by branch
… of Judges’ Disciplinary High Court:
Degradation of one judicial grade as disciplinary punishment for numerous
violations inserted in the above-mentioned judgment
____________________________________________________________________
Justice In Islam
Hojjatoleslam
Valmoslemin Abbasali Alizadeh
The other reason
that the great spiritual leaders mentions for this doctrine is
Esteshab doctrine (the existing state of things at any given date),
that is, the liable person shall perform an obligation but can not
complete some parts of it, so he has doubt that he should do the
other parts or not? For example: saying prayers: the liable person
shall say prayers that have all the conditions and parts but maybe
in a situation he can not stand to say prayers, is sitting prayers
essential to him? Or he is liable to perform an affair in the
certain time but for some reasons, he misses the time, is it
essential to perform the affair after passing the certain time or
not?
____________________________________________________________________
One Vote, One
Experience
“Possession is not
merely means physically touch but transferring power wire above the
buildings is considered more than possession.”
- Judgment No. 999
dated July 6, 2003, drawn up by branch No. 151 of Tehran Court of
Law
____________________________________________________________________
Around the Table
The following questions were discussed in the around table, the
commission majority or unanimity of votes are as follows:
310-
Is arbitration contracts, subject of Note under Article 458 of
Procedural Law of Public and Revolutionary Courts in the civil
affairs, only for Principal 139 of Constitutional Law or is it
including of the private contracts too?
Opinion of unanimity of votes of members of the current commission
in the session dated July 29, 2004 (Mordad 8, 1383)
First of all: By conclusion of contract of arbitration for each
party to the contract, the acquired right is created which seems
that change in legal regulations cannot negate the acquired rights
of each party to the contract and besides as per Article 4 of Civil
Law, “Effect of law is regarding the future and law has no effect
regarding its previous unless in the law itself, special regulations
have been adopted concerning this subject.”
Second: Article 458, has foreseen and stated fundamentals related to
arbitration and has not known it specially for Principal 139 of
Constitutional Law, also from the clause of “in compliance with
Principal 139 of the Constitutional Law” inserted in the said note,
it is inferred that this clause is only applied for the governmental
arbitration contracts and explains that as governmental arbitration
contracts have been concluded before approval of Principal 139 of
the Constitutional Law, while they are subject to regulations of the
contract drawing up time rather essentially contents of Principal
139 of the Constitutional Law shall be observed regarding these
contracts as a result the said clause cannot cause allocation of
Note and its exclusion only for the governmental contracts.
311-
Regarding the subject of Article 355 of Civil Law, in case the
customer and the seller, respectively concerning less or more
property measurement, object of transaction, do not want to use
their cancellation right, and do not have mutual consent, is claim
of difference of the sum hearable or not according to the case?
Opinion of unanimity of votes of members of the current commission
in the session dated July 29, 2004 (Mordad 8, 1383)
Regarding the contents of Article 355 of Civil Law, which is decided
that a property is sold in condition of having a certain measurement
and accepted by the parties to the transaction, whereas in
performance of such a transaction, the price elements are not placed
against the object of sale elements rather total price of
transaction is placed against all the sold property. So if the sold
property measurement is more or less only there is cancellation
right regarding option of violation of the above-mentioned article
or mutual consent about exclusive or deficiency. As a result, claim
for difference cannot be heard as per the said Article.
312-
Does criminal prosecution of fraudulent bankrupt or culpable
bankrupt, requires its type by the court of law in bankruptcy
judgment?
Opinion of majority of votes of the members of the current
commission in the session dated July 29, 2004 (Mordad 8, 1383)
According to majority opinion, investigation of the said crimes in
the penal courts needs issuance of bankruptcy judgment in the court
of law. In the meantime, court of law while announcing bankruptcy,
shall specify its type so that penal court can investigate it.
313-
Can the prisons accept the individuals introduced through Dispute
Settlement Councils?
Opinion of majority of votes of the members of the current
commission in the session dated July 29, 2004 (Mordad 8, 1383)
With respect to Principal of Necessity of Penal Proceedings,
charge(s) of everyone shall be investigated in the competent
judicial authorities, even though it causes that person conviction
for a paltry sum as cash fine. (Principal 36 of the Constitutional
Law of the Islamic Republic of Iran: Judgment for punishment and its
execution shall be only through the competent court and by virtue of
law.) As goal of establishment of dispute settlement council as per
article 189 of Law for third plan of development, is local
settlement of disputes and the affairs which do not have judicial
nature or their judicial nature has less complication, so as first
of all: dispute settlement council cannot be named court, second:
from the above legal phrases, competence of this council in
investigation of penal affairs is not inferred therefore it shall be
said that the answer to the question is negative.
____________________________________________________________________
Educational System in America
In this part, the
writer set forth the following:
Pre-University Studies
University Studies
Academic Courses
Manner of Evaluation of the Academic Certificates
Introducing Universities and Higher Educational Centers in America
A)
Universities and Higher Educational Centers, grade
1 (Distinguished)
B)
Universities and Higher Educational Centers, grade
2 (Good)
Although
certificates of universities of grade 2 can be evaluated but it is
recommended that the students study in the universities of grade 1
(distinguished) for Master and PhD courses.
C)
Universities and Higher Educational Centers, grade
3 (Fair), which were accredited by Ministry of Culture & Welfare of
America, but their names are not in the list of grade 1 and grade 2,
but they are evaluated in the level of Bachelor.
Table for Evaluation Quality of Academic Certificates of
Universities of America
____________________________________________________________________
Writing Criticism of
One Verdict
Mohammadreza
Khosravi
The writer in this
issue, studies one verdict and sets forth its problem:
One of the problems
is as follows:
- To introduce the
complainant and the defendant, their full particulars shall be
mentioned especially when a verdict is to be published in the
newspaper; the accused should be introduced in the manner that his
particulars do not befall the others regarding the name and surname
similarity.
____________________________________________________________________
Conflict of Affairs
of Islamic Government & Individual Rights
Ayatollah Mohammad
Momen
Q: If the Islamic
Government wants to do something to the advantage of the nation and
this affair of the government makes conflict with rights of natural
or legal entities, whether financial or non-financial, is these
individuals satisfaction necessary or not so that the mentioned
affair is allowable?
A: Although in the
previous speech it has been evident that Authority extent is not
limited to decision making about interests and advantages of the
nation in the public affairs, so we emphasize more on this claim and
say that:
Authority extent is
more expanded than limits of decision making about the public
interests, because supervisor takes care of person under his
supervision so that he may not deviate from the correct way to the
place that cause him meanness and damage. Whereas, the God’s
judgments are ratified so that help the people and lead them to the
good ways, this is of the duties of the Islamic nation Leader so
that he safeguards the people’s rights and prepares the society in
the manner that the nation lead to perform these judgments, the
judgments which are a guarantee for this world and the next
prosperity.
____________________________________________________________________
Article
Study of Article 10 of Compulsory Insurance Law of Torts of Owners
of Land Motor Vehicles Against Third Party
Prepared by: Abdollah Khodabakhshi – Assistant to the Public
Prosecutor General of Public Prosecutor’s Office of District 6 of
Tehran
First Part
Importance of
governing laws on the car accidents
Every day card
accidents happen and have a greater role of other events. It can be
said that these events are the most important and common torts which
allocate the courts time to themselves at least in the recent
half-century. The governing principles on this events have been
changed and are studying in some of the legal systems such as Common
Law, as one of the harmful measures (tort) in an independence form
and the governing laws on these harmful measures (law of tort) do
not include them. In France, by virtue of law ratified on Jan. 5,
1985, the independence and new principles have been compiled for
these events, which can be compared by the Iranian legislator and
their positive notes can be accepted. Andre Tunc, one of the popular
writers in the field of tort states: “such as some of the writers, I
believe that traditional domain (tort) and law of torts shall be
divided into two parts of tort law and accident law, the first type
shall talk about the deliberate conducts and the second type shall
talk about the happenings, the new law should divide the tort from
the happenings. The section of happenings includes work happenings,
car accidents, and medical happenings.
One of the most
important changes in this regard is interference and appearance of
the insurance institution. By interference of insurance, in the car
accidents, the main purpose is damage compensation and the insurer
is the main personality in the external achievement of this affair
as stated by Karboniye, the French writer. Appearing the insurance,
Law of torts have changed very much inclusive of decline of theory
of fault, omission of some of elements of tort, encouragement of the
judges to judgment rendering for the high amounts of damage, full
interpretation of law in the advantage of whom the loss incurred
for, increase of the claims and appearance of the important claim in
the advanced systems of the tort in the name of “direct claim of
whom the loss incurred against the insurer which is not considered
by the judicial precedent. The other important effects are creation
of “complementary projects of tort covering” which has the duty of
damage compensation of the ones whom the loss incurred for along
with institution of insurance of tort.
____________________________________________________________________
Cyber Crimes
Written & Prepared
by Mohammad Hassan Deziani
First Part
Following to holding
the in service educational classes of judges, from Mehr 1383 (Sept.
22 to Oct. 21, 2003), two course/educational titles were included in
these courses as follows:
-
Internet crimes (or in a more proper
interpretation: cyber crimes = crimes against data technology) for
the judges of penal courts
-
Internet claims (or in a more proper
interpretation: cyber law = data technology law) for the judges of
courts of law
In the cyber crimes
course, these subjects are set forth preliminarily and in about 5
sessions: 1. Generalities including periods of using computer and
penal and legal issues resulted from each period, new fields of law
and cyber crimes and …, 2. Nature of cyber crimes, 3 & 4. Summary
description and classification of cyber crimes groups, 5. Procedural
law of cyber crimes and cyber jursidicition
Also in the course
of cyber law (Internet claims in the said interpretation in the
course plan), these subjects are set forth in the limits of 5 course
sessions: 1- Generalities (common with the penal course), 2 & 3-
Informative contracts, 4- Civil responsibility in the digital
environment, 5- Mental ownership in the cyber space
As the class topics
are very general and in the listing form statement of the legal
problems and issues, therefore we are about to mention some of the
topics in details in Ghezavat monthly so that the judges, jurist
consults, attorneys and students of law can refer to the detailed
studies regarding their interests.
____________________________________________________________________
Historical
This part is about
Mr. Mohammad Vojdani, public prosecutor general at the time of Reza
Khan. He was preserver of the nation laws and rights. This part is a
real story about time of the women unveiling and defense of Mr.
Vojdani from a veiled woman.
____________________________________________________________________
Commission
Point 1-
Multiplicity of issuance of bill of indictment
Point 2-
In case of necessity and expedience, public prosecutor can refer the
case to the other interrogator.
Point 3-
If public prosecutor accepts statement of refusal, instead of him,
one of his deputies will give opinion regarding final order of the
assistant to the public prosecutor general.
Point 4-
Crimes subject of Note 3 of Article 3, amended
Point 5-
In the current laws, there is no public prosecutor of the province
or his duties.
Point 6-
Announcement of cases of losing check to the bank merely has
announcement aspect.
Point 7-
In crimes subject to amended Note 3 dated Oct. 19, 2002 of Law for
Establishment of Public and Revolutionary Courts, judges of the
public prosecutor’s office can merely order so that the case is
referred to the relevant court judge.
Point 8-
Confession in the public prosecutor’s office
Point 9-
The complainant cannot be called up. Opinion No. 4998/7 dated Oct.
3, 2004
Point
10-
Public prosecutor’s Office of center of province does not have right
of interference in the affairs of penal courts of the cities and
districts.
Point
11-
Before issuance of writ of incompetence, there is no need for
announcement of proceedings termination.
Point
12-
The accused multiple accusations
Point
13-
Crime subject of Article 638 of Islamic Penal Code shall primarily
be investigated in the public prosecutor’s office. |