|
Editor in Chief"s Note
In
2005, a by-law including 247 articles and 108 notes in execution of
law for change in supervision of prisons was approved by Chief of
the Judiciary such as:
-
To introduce the children and youth
less than 18 years old to the Institution (Article 17)
-
The judicial, security, military and
disciplinary authorities are prohibited from having the private
prison. (Article 22)
-
Working of the convicted persons (Note
of Article 61)
-
The convicted are not needed to wear
special cloths unless by recognition of head of the prisons
organization (Article 90)
-
To insure the convicted persons
(Article 117)
-
Bar Association can construct a room
in each prison by its expense and opinion of the Organization which
is allocated for visit of the attorneys of the justice
administration with their principals (Note 1 of Article 187)
-
Financial and spiritual support of the
convicted ready for return to the society (Article 244)
_____________________________________________________________________
A Selection of Latest Legal Approvals
-
Ownership of garden
belonging to the individuals for construction of the office is not
subject to Article 5 of Urban Land Law.
-
Amendment of
Article 18 of Executive By-Law of Narcotics Control Law
-
Clauses of
executive rules of budget of the year 2006 of the country
-
Precedent verdict
No. 685 of General Board of Supreme Court concerning destruction of
natural resources and the environment
-
Precedent verdict
No. 686 dated May 15, 2006 of General Board of Supreme Court
concerning dispute settlement authority between juvenile court in
the judicial area of one province and penal court of the same
province
_____________________________________________________________________
Disciplinary Warnings
q
Judgment No. 506 dated Feb. 13, 2006, drawn up by branch No. … of
Judges’ Disciplinary High Court: Issuance of
writ of rejection of plaint of revision of one of the judgment
debtors for this reason that the other convicted persons have not
taken measure regarding rectifying the defect of the said petition
and … it is violation.
q
Judgment No. 411 dated Dec. 12, 2005, drawn up by branch No…. of
Judges’ Disciplinary High Court: accusation explanation (fraud) to
the accused person without accusation proofs explanation is
violation.
q
Judgment No. 431 and 432 dated Oct. 4, 2005, drawn up by branch No.
… of Judges’ Disciplinary High Court: Disciplinary condemnation for
inappropriate penal security obtaining
q
Judgment No. 492 dated Jan. 30, 2006, drawn up by branch No. … of
Judges’ Disciplinary High Court: Adjournment of meeting of
proceedings without mentioning legal reason is violation.
q
Judgment No. 494 and 495 dated Feb. 6, 2006, drawn up by branch No.
… of Judges’ Disciplinary High Court: Execution of the arbitrator
verdict against governmental institute (regarding the case of State
Corn Organization) without the fact that the subject of referring to
the arbitration according to regulations of article 457 of law of
subject of referring to the arbitration according to regulations of
article 457 of law of public and revolutionary courts in the civil
affairs has been performed by approval of council of ministers, is
violation.
_____________________________________________________________________
One Vote, One Experience
One
vote, one experience of this issue is regarding dispute settlement
after dispute occurrence or without dispute occurrence
Please
pay attention to the following verdicts in this regard:
1.
Verdict No. 393 dated Dec. 18, 2005,
drawn up by branch No… of Supreme Court located at Ghom
2.
Verdict No. 499 dated Mar. 12, 2006,
drawn up by branch No…. of Supreme Court located at Ghom
_____________________________________________________________________
Around the Table
The following questions were discussed in the around table, the
commission majority or unanimity of votes are as follows:
352- If
two persons are partners of business license and key money (without
the fact that they are owners of object of lease) and one of them
claims for eviction or ejection against the other partner, can the
said claim be filed?
Opinion of unanimity of votes of members of the current commission
in the session dated Mar. 2, 2006
First of all- Ownership includes corpus and usufruct that the said
two persons are owners of the usufruct. Second- There are two
presumptions in the question. First, as inserted in the question,
two partners are jointly working as a result they have key-money
right, so their possession is not unlawful so that the action of
ejection is brought and in case of having the other disputes such as
financial or nuisance and prevention, the subject will be
investigated as per the regulations but the second presumption is
that maybe one of the partners is owner of all the common usufruct
in the unlawful manner, in this case, as the aforesaid persons are
owners of the usufruct, up to the time that eviction judgment is not
issued upon request of the corpus owner, the other partner can bring
the action of ejection. In the meantime, as the two partners have no
relation regarding rent, bringing action of eviction is cancelled.
353-
Does Article 7 of The Protection of Family Act concerning
determination of the competent court remain in force?
Opinion of majority of votes of the members of the current
commission in the session dated Mar. 2, 2006
Except the punishment inserted in Article 17 of the protection of
family act approved in 1974 which is announced as contrary to
religious law by the Guardian Council, there is no explicit opinion
statement regarding other regulations of the said act and on the
other hand, the said act is a special act and the recently approved
act of public civil procedure, also, other act which announced the
express or implicit abrogation of the mentioned act has not been
approved and according to opinions of some ones, as this act has
been approved by protection viewpoint, it shall not be abrogated by
approval of the other act, therefore, legal judgment of the above
article remains in force, of course some parts of note of the said
article in relation with execution of the final judgments about
divorce is contradictory to single article of law for amendment of
the regulations related to the divorce.
354- Is
punishment inserted in Article 541 of Islamic Punishment Law merely
related to the educational tests? Or does it include the other tests
such as employment and driving?
Opinion of majority of votes of the members of the current
commission in the session dated Mar. 2, 2006
As importance of the tests, subject of question, is not less than
the scientific tests of the schools rather they may have more
importance, moreover, they have existed at the time of legislation
therefore it is unlikely to say the said tests have not been
considered by the legislator as a result judgment of Article 541 of
the Islamic Punishment Law does not include the mentioned tests, in
the meantime, it shall be said that if the purpose of the legislator
was merely the educational tests, the word “other” was not mentioned
so mentioning the educational institutes inserted in the said
article is example, therefore, there is no doubt that judgment of
article 541 of the mentioned law includes educational, employment
and driving tests.
355- A
tenant has transferred object of lease to the others for the same
occupation without permit of transfer to the others, transferee is
occupied with a new occupation in the object of lease, the owner has
given petition of eviction for change in the occupation, can the
eviction for change in occupation be accepted?
Opinion of unanimity of votes of members of the current commission
in the session dated May 17, 2006
In the question, two violations have been mentioned: transfer to the
others and change in occupation. So if the tenant has had permit of
transfer to the others and then he has taken measure, there is no
violation rather in this case, the second tenant is substitute of
the first tenant and filing the claim of eviction for change in
occupation against the second tenant is acceptable, on the other
hand, if the first tenant has not have the right of transfer to the
others and has taken measure regarding transfer of the object of
lease to the others, in this case as there is no contractual
relation between the owner and the transferee, filing the claim of
eviction for change in occupation against the transferee will not be
acceptable rather the owner can file the claim of eviction for
violation of transfer to the others.
356-
Can the decisions of investigation board of Article 17 of stock
exchange law be objected or not? If yes, who is its investigation
authority and how long is the respite of objection to the opinion of
the said board?
Opinion of majority of votes of the members of the current
commission in the session dated May 25, 2006
The decisions, subject of question, can be objected and its
investigation authority is Administrative Justice Court.
357-
Regarding the recent interpretation of Guardian Council of Principal
173 of the Constitutional Law about monopoly of competence of the
court concerning the governmental by-laws, who is the objection
authority regarding the decisions and by-laws of the other Powers?
Opinion of majority of votes of the members of the current
commission in the session dated May 25, 2006
Regarding the recent interpretation of the Guardian Council about
the competence of Administrative Justice Court merely concerning
investigation of by-laws and approvals of the executive, regarding
the question, no authority has not been predicted for investigation
therefore the only way for performance of this relief is its
announcement to the Guardian Council.
358- Is
purpose of “…the property, object of bid, will be sold for any rate
that it has purchaser…” inserted in Article 131 of civil judgments
execution law, is sale of that property even below the assessed
price? Or the purpose is sale of each rate of the property, object
of bid, in case of existence of the purchaser by observance of the
assessed price?
Opinion of unanimity of votes of members of the current commission
in the session dated May 25, 2006
The purpose of “for any rate” inserted in Article 131 of civil
judgments execution law is that part of the property, object of bid,
including share, number, … that can be sold. In this case, the
judgment execution can take measure regarding the same part of the
said property which is saleable concerning the expertise price. It
shall be mentioned that if we consider “for any rate” as any price
(less than the expertise price) and take measure in this regard, it
is contrary to the interest of the judgment debtor and also contrary
to Article 132 of the mentioned law although the price difference is
paltry.
_____________________________________________________________________
Writing Criticism of One Verdict
Mohammadreza Khosravi
In this
issue the writer sets forth a verdict issued by Booshehr Public
Courts and then criticizes it. One of these criticizes is as
follows:
-
Relief is not clear. Is really the relief specific performance as it
has been mentioned in abstract of record? If yes, this is the
question: which obligation and for whom? But the verdict description
shows that defendants apparently are obliged to pay some money to
the plaintiff for doing some work and now the plaintiff demands the
same amount. Of course if this understanding is correct, the
conviction of the defendants to the obligation performance in the
end of the verdict is not successful.
_____________________________________________________________________
Article
Reasons of Proceedings Lengthening and Solutions for its Prevention
By Mohammad Esmaeil Ebadi,
Second part,
Section Two – Issues related to judgment
Chapter One- Primary problems of rendering verdict
Part One- Infirmity and depreciation problems of administrative
texture
Part Two – Expertise Problems
Part Three- Judicial Papers Notification Problems
Part Four - Proceedings Lengthening resulted from legal tricks of
attorneys of parties to the suit
Chapter Two- Existing problems at the time of rendering verdict
Part One- Problems of some of inexperienced judges
Part Two – Insufficient education
Part Three – Non-Specialized courts
Chapter Three- Proceedings lengthening resulted from complaint of
judicial decisions and non-observance of the judged matter rule
Part One - Proceedings lengthening resulted from complaint of
judicial decisions
Part Two - Non-observance of the judged matter rule limits
_____________________________________________________________________
Article
Business Law
By Dr. Akhlaghi,
Third Session,
Letter of credit is a deed which is issued by the bank upon request
of the customer and is confirmation of an amount to the account of a
certain person or to the order of that person. The beneficiary
undertakes to pay or accepts to pay the sum of the commercial papers
of such a person or permits the other bank to pay or promotes the
sum of such a commercial papers. Usually the payments in the
transactions are through three ways: 1. Bank Bill, 2. Drafts, 3.
Letter of Credit (L/C). Letter of credits are divided into two
types: 1. Revocable letter of credit & 2. Irrevocable letter of
credit
_____________________________________________________________________
Foreign Part
Report
of Travel to Singapore
Third
Part
In this part, two sections are mentioned:
First Section – Visit with Mr. Richard Magnus – introducing
judicial organization of Singapore
A-Subordinate Courts including:
A-
District Courts
B-
Magistrate Courts
C-
Juvenile Courts
D-
Coroner’s Courts
E-
Small Claims Tribunal
Then Competence of courts under subordinate courts are set forth:
1.
District Courts
2.
Magistrate Courts
3.
Family Courts
4.
Juvenile Courts
5.
Small Claims Tribunal
Then competence of the special courts are set forth:
1.
The commercial courts cluster
2.
The criminal mention’s courts
3.
Judgment rendering central courts
4.
The special sentencing courts
5.
The night courts
6.
The filter Courts
7.
Driving offenses courts
8.
Coroner’s courts
9.
Special centers
10.
Islam divine law courts
B- Supreme Court including:
1.
Appeal Court
2.
High Court
Second Section – General deduction of me of the fundamentals and
success reasons of Singapore courts in corruption control and
obtaining general confidence
1.
Cultural and social grounds
2.
Training judges and employees and
earning their livings
3.
Making of necessary laws for
decreasing cases entrance to the court and quality of the
investigations
_____________________________________________________________________
An Introduction to the Iran Penal Policy Regarding Cyber Crimes
Mohammadhassan Deziyani
First
Part:
Cyber
crimes are of the crimes which are new and resulted from modern
technology. Considering to these two points: to be new and resulted
from modern technology, has many effects in any criminal analysis.
These two points are effective when the subject is limited from
general to the partial that is international to national. Cyber
criminal phenomenon has been initiated about half century ago and
the countries engaged in it gradually, but speed of them to this new
criminal phenomenon is not similar. Some of the countries have
engaged in this criminal phenomenon very soon (such as Germany,
America, England and …) and some of them very late (such as
countries of Middle Asia and some of the Middle East countries and
…). Result of this affair can be observed in the form of
compilation, non-compilation of the criminal policy of the cyber
crimes, concerning the concerned country. Maybe if it can be talked
easily about the criminal policy and its types in the other penal
fields, it is not easy and even possible in the cyber crimes.
In this
text, which is really an introduction to criminal policy of the
cyber crimes, free from Iran or other country, the writer does not
intend to be engaged in the subjects comparatively. |