Editor in Chief’s Note
The editor in chief in
this issue sets forth 4 points about judicial precedent regarding
the contracts that have made contingent the dispute settlement upon
arbitration.
Summary of these points
are: 1. If one party objects the arbitrator’s opinion, he cannot
refute the mutual consent of submission to arbitration. 2. Losing
the original written contract about arbitration does not cause any
damage the parties’ mutual consent and there is no need for writing
the arbitration contract again. 3. The arbitrator is entitled to
observe the arbitration regulations, he is not bound to observe the
regulations of civil procedure. 4. Arbitration condition in absolute
status is a binding commitment but if it is conditional, in case of
achievement of condition, it is binding otherwise it is not
considered as commitment.
___________________________________
A
Selection of Latest Legal Approvals
·
Notification of all the
judicial papers such as civil and criminal is undertaken by the
disciplinary force.
·
Birth of each baby born
in Iran, where his (her) parents are Iranian or foreigner should be
registered.
·
Application of title of
smuggled goods for the vehicles having ownership deed is contrary to
credibility of the official deeds.
·
Verdict No. 721 of
General Board of Administrative Justice Court regarding payment of
dependants and children allowance concerning their divorced
daughters
·
Obligation of the
government for payment of 1/10 of the least monthly salary of the
government employees for purchase of the goods and needs depends on
allocation of credit.
·
Law for accession of one
article to Islamic Criminal Law regarding manner of supervision on
the offenders with the past criminal records
·
Approval of Expediency
Council about interpretation of single article of law for suggesting
the proper course of lands delegated by the government and
institutions
·
Current price of blood
money judgments
·
Taking agreement of the
trade unions is not necessary for drawing up official deeds of lease
of shops and businesses.
·
Prevention of granting
ambiguous, brief, general and defective delegations
·
Facilitation of execution
of duties of special judicial board dispatched to the provinces for
investigation of courts and prisons
·
Headquarter of narcotics
control is bound to observe the law for public calculations in
manner of credits spending
·
Other public and
revolutionary prosecutor’s offices issue clearance certificate too.
·
Re-amendment of amended
Article (73) of executive bylaw of law for investigation of
administrative violations
·
Justice Administration is
the competent authority for dispute settlement about measures of
Ministry of Energy and the owners or possessors of river bed and
limit
·
Dismissal of an employee
of a certain job does not require dismissal of his service and
breaking off the employment relation with the governmental unit.
·
Payment of pension to the
daughters and granddaughters of the governmental employees depends
on having no husband and occupation.
·
Investigation of claims
in the Customs affairs depends on final result of verdicts of
Customs Disputes Investigation Commission.
·
Bylaw for manner of
election of official experts
___________________________________
Disciplinary Warning
q
Judgment No. 136 dated Sept. 2, 2007, drawn up by branch … of
Judges' Disciplinary High Court: "Conviction of the mother for
refusal of delivery of the 11 year-old daughter (to the father) in
the court of first instance, quash of the mentioned judgment in the
court of appeals and rendering of acquittal judgment of the mother"
q
Judgment No. 509 and 510 dated Jan. 25, 2005, drawn up by Judges’
Disciplinary High Court: "Permanent dismissal for the judicial
services due to numerous disciplinary convictions records"
q
Judgment No. 134 dated Aug. 21, 2007, drawn up by branch… of Judges’
Disciplinary High Court: “Disciplinary condemnation of the prison
observer assistant prosecutor due to breach of execution of articles
214 and 207 of the prisons affairs bylaw and article 145 of criminal
procedure code."
q
Judgment No. 135 dated Aug. 21, 2007, drawn up by branch… of Judges’
Disciplinary High Court: “Conviction of the owner of goods to
payment of cash fine substitute of imprisonment in accusation of
smuggling of the goods which has not been barred to import is
violation."
___________________________________
One
Vote, One Experience
1-
Judgment No. 827 dated
Sept. 22, 2004, drawn up by Branch No. 117, of Tehran Court of Law:
"… Judgment for detaching possession of the plaintiff from 4 joint
shares out of the total 6 shares of key money of the above mentioned
shop for an unreal contract and reacquisition of the plaintiff…”
2-
Judgment No. 180 dated
May 2, 2005, drawn up by Branch No. 8 of Court of Appeals of Tehran
Province while reversal of primary judgment: "… detaching possession
of the 4 joint shares out of the total 6 shares of the key money of
shop in a joint partnership has no legal base…".
3-
Judgment No. 5/1348 dated
Nov. 25, 2006, drawn up by Verification Branch No. 5 of the High
Court while reversal of judgment of court of appeals: "…detaching
possession of the transgressors of 4 joint shares (in compliance
with Article 43 of Civil Judgments Execution Law) from the joint
shop has been issued as per the regulations and its breach by the
court of appeals has no legal base…".
___________________________________
Around the Table
The
following questions were discussed in the round table, the
commission’s majority or unanimity of votes is as follows:
390-
Is the priority inserted in clause 1 of article 148 of the Law for
Execution of Civil Judgments regarding the immovable property
attached in favor of two persons at one date necessary between them?
(one property in favor of two persons with two writs of attachment
in Reg. Dept. in one date but with two attached Nos.)
Opinion of nearly the unanimity of votes of the members of the
commission present in the session dated Nov. 1, 2007
By
virtue of Article 148 of the Law for Execution of Civil Judgments in
any case that numerous execution writs reaches the execution part,
the bailiff should observe right of priority of each of the judgment
creditors respectively (four clauses of the Article). Clause one of
the Article declares: "If the immovable or movable property of the
judgment debtor is under mortgage or pawn or is the object of the
conditional transaction etc. or under seizure in favor of the
judgment creditor, he or she will have priority for the amount of
judgment debt over the other judgment creditors." With respect to
the above notions and the fact that whenever the immovable property
(subject of the question) has not been attached through Reg. Dept.,
the executive measures are not possible and attachment of this
property with two relief writ of attachment in one date and under
one No. is not possible, it should be registered under two Nos., in
this case the guideline of action for bailiff for observance of the
priority is the No. that has been registered initially (smaller No.)
that is the creditor who has been succeeded to introduce the
property and attach it earlier, will have the priority right for
collection of his claim.
391-
In case the judgment creditor that is prior regarding property
attachment, does not take measure to obtain the execution writ, what
option has the other judgment creditor if the property is sufficient
merely for the first judgment debt?
Opinion of nearly the unanimity of votes of the members of the
commission present in the session dated Nov. 1, 2007
The case reveals
the judgment creditor has attached the property of the judgment
debtor prior to the other judgment creditors and the value of the
attached property is equal to the first judgment debt but he does
not request to obtain execution writ. The question is that in such a
case, can the second judgment creditor request to obtain execution
writ or not?
In reply, it shall
be said that we have no text of law that the judgment creditor is to
request to obtain execution writ after the judgment becomes
executable and in a stipulated time afterward, even with making of
the writ if the execution operations are not followed up and the
issued writ becomes ineffective after 5 years, the judgment creditor
can request for a new writ again from the court (Article 168 of Law
for Execution of Civil Judgments) Therefore in subject at hand the
priority right that the first judgment creditor achieved at the
attachment of the property and its value is not more than the
judgment debt, as this right is not waived it will remain in force.
So there is no turn for the second judgment creditor, but if the
second judgment creditor claims that the claim of the first judgment
creditor is fictitious, he can object the rendered judgment as third
party opposition. If the claim is proved to be fictitious and the
necessary decision is rendered, the attachment will be lifted. In
this case the second judgment creditor can request for the executive
measure concerning the property for himself.
392- Some of the costumers of the Pawn
Bank present fake or low purity and worthless gold plates (according
to the evaluation) to ask for a loan and it is evident that they
cannot succeed; What will be the legal measure of the bank regarding
the person brought the gold plates and what the bank can do
regarding the discovered fake and low purity gold plates?
Opinion of nearly the unanimity of votes of the members of the
commission present in the session dated Nov. 29, 2007
By evaluation and
discovery of the fake and low purity gold plates that presented to
the bank by some of the customers to ask for a loan, two
suppositions are reviewable: First, the customer is not aware of the
fact that the gold plates are fake and of low purity: in this case
no loan can be obtained and it is evident that the property should
be returned to him by refusal of his request, second, he knows the
fact that the gold plates are fake and of low quality and his
purpose is to acquire the property fraudulently; in this case, as
the bank is obliged to declare concerning their type and value by
evaluating the properties, if after evaluation, it becomes clear
that the presented properties are fake and of low quality, in this
case no facilities belong to the person as per the bank regulations.
On the other hand no offense has been occurred because the bank has
performed its duty correctly and the applicant measures that is
presentation of the properties even if the owner knows the fact that
they are fake or of low quality, is not subject to any of the
offences, because doubt cannot be a basis for crime and punishment.
The measures of the applicant may be strictly subject to Note 1 of
Article 41 of Islamic Criminal Law even in this case, attempting is
not fulfilled while the mentioned properties may be of low quality
but they are not without value, and finally if the customer succeeds
to receive the facilities, he is to repay them. According to the
above notions, there is no crime and the bank has no obligation to
invoke Article 29 of Criminal Procedure Code but the properties
should be returned and his request be rejected.
393- Someone is adjudged to transfer
and deliver an apartment from the total 20 units to the judgment
creditor without determination of the unit No., if all the units
(all 20 units) have been transferred to the others, is action of the
judgment creditor acceptable under title of transfer of another’s
property? If the answer is positive, how can returning of the
property be performed?
Opinion of
majority of votes of members present in the commission in the
session
dated Nov. 29, 2007 and Jan. 31, 2008
The subject is of
the examples of Article 1 of the Criminal Law concerning transfer of
another’s property in 1929 and Article 1 of Law for Aggravation of
Punishment of Perpetrators of Embezzlement and Fraud and Bribery and
regarding the return of the property, as in this case, it is not
possible, the criminal court should render judgment for payment of
the current price of the apartment according to the opinion of the
expert.
___________________________________
+Thesis
*Res
Judicata of a Criminal Matter in a Civil Action
Seventh Part
Prepared by: Batoul Ahani
In continuation of this
issue, among the conditions of effectiveness of criminal case on a
civil one, is unity of subject matters, for example, study of actus
reus and mens rea prepares grounds of the unity from criminal and
civil viewpoint. In physical element, it has been said that the main
condition and axis of the unity in the investigation of issues is
that there is identity in the act surveyed in crime actus reus and
the action which is fundamental for liability in a civil action. In
this part, the writer discusses the mens rea and if the concepts of
civil and criminal fault are the same? Some believe in civil and
criminal fault unity but the writer regards its basis, illogic and
its results indefensible and another opinion is differentiation and
dualism between civil and criminal fault which has been studied in
detail.
* Title of the thesis was
“Doctrine of a Penal Matter Adjudged in Civil Action” which has been
changed to the current title by opinion of one of the law
knowledgeable individuals.
___________________________________
A
Selection of World Legal News
1-
Declaration of
support of Malaysia Head of Supreme Court from the suggested
amendments in this country judiciary
2-
Saudi Guantanamo
Bay detainee plans boycott of military commission trial
3-
UN security
council should address MNF-Iraq detainee policies: HRW
4-
Spain court rules
against extraditing Peron to face Argentina "Dirty War" Charges
5-
Woman extradited
to Michigan after 32 years as fugitive
6-
Denmark government
to propose headscarf ban for judges
7-
Studios Win $ 100
million judgment against Torrent Spy
8-
Pakistan court
clears Bhutto widower of smuggling charges
___________________________________
Foreign Part
Obstacles in Joining the Islamic
Republic of Iran to the Convention of Non Torture & Inhumane or
Humiliating Behavior or Punishment
Tarahhom Asadian,
Commonly, the word torture is applied for the measures under which a
person is put under pressure, physically or mentally for obtaining
confession and as often the accused does not voluntary confess at
the beginning, this method may be used against the accused.
Prohibition of Torture in the Islamic Republic of Iran Laws
In
the divine law of Islam (as the human is believed to have prestige
and natural greatness) physical torture is an indecent and forbidden
affair and applying rights resulted from it as well as confession
received in this method is not effective. In Iranian laws, torture
is a criminal act and its perpetrator is entitled to punishment.
Effects of Prohibition of Torture in Iran Laws:
1.
Legal acts fulfilled with
torture are ineffective.
2.
The confession resulted
from torture is ineffective.
3.
Punishment of torturer
Convention of Non-Torture & the Islamic Republic of Iran’s View on
it
Result
It
is clear that what has been mentioned regarding necessity of
non-joining of the Islamic Republic of Iran to Convention of
Non-Torture does not mean the confirmation of torture and its
acceptance as a lawful measure. Therefore, as described, torture is
prohibited in our laws and the torturer is punished and the legal
acts resulted from torture is cancelled but the reason for
opposition of joining to the Convention is that this Convention
regards many of our canonical and legal punishments as torture
(based on articles 1 & 16) and persistently asks for their
abrogation and obliges the member governments to cancel the
punishments that are inhumane and humiliating based on the
Convention’s definition as soon as possible.
As a
result, it can be said that while we disagree any type of torture
and regard it a criminal measure, we do not construe legal
punishment as torture and consider its applying in line with the
state’s criminal policy for keeping public order and reserving the
society rights as a necessary affair.
___________________________________
The
Month’s Guest
Statements of Mr. Rabiaa Eskini, Ph.D.
Prepared by: Seyed Ebrahim Mahdiyoun
The history of check is among the most
important issues which is related to the courts and public
prosecutor’s offices… Check is an instrument by which the issuer
collects the amount that is before the bank or transfers it to
others. In Iran the regulations of check have been derived from
France law.
But in practice, the individuals - whether
in Iran or abroad – do not use the check as same as the law
prescribes. Since the check is a mean for immediate payment, so the
date of payment is not applicable for it and it has merely date of
issue.
Whether in old laws (trade law and check
issuance law) or in the following laws, the date of payment is not
set forth. In spite of this, check is used as a credit mean – such
as draft.
In case the holder and issuer agree that
it is paid at the later (future) date, there is no problem legally
because if the check has no date, it is null and void (that is not a
check).
In our law, there is the same. The Trade
law regards date of issue as one of the principal conditions of the
correctness of check, and in practice the banks do not pay the
checks without date. So if a check is drawn, the bank is liable to
pay it. But check is the same instrument as the law accepts. If it
has no date it is null and void but with an unreal date, it does not
become null and void.
I believe that if check has date of issue
and date of payment, its payment date should be ignored because it
is null, so the holder can refer to the bank at the inserted date as
date of issue.
___________________________________
Article
An Introduction to International Police
(INTERPOL) & NAJA INTEPOL
In this article, the
following cases are studied:
Ø
History
Ø
Commissions
Ø
Organization & Institutions of Interpol
1.
General Assembly
2.
Executive Committee
3.
General Secretariat
4.
Interpol of the Member
Countries
5.
Counselors
Ø
International Declarations
1-
Blue Notice – Enquiry
2-
Green Notice – Warning
3-
Yellow Notice – Missing
Person
4-
Black Notice – United
Ratified Body
5-
Red Notice – Wanted
5-1-
Contents of Notice
5-2-
Identity Particulars
5-3-
Judicial Data
Ø
24-Hours Communication System
Ø
Interpol Signs & Marks
v
An
Introduction to Department General of NAJA INTERPOL
A)
Commission
-
Important Duties
1)
Extradition
2)
Issuance of Absence of
Criminal Record Certificate in Latin
3)
Search for International
Missing Persons
-
Stages for Search of
International Missing Persons
4)
Measure regarding
Identification of Anonymous Dead Bodies
5)
Measure regarding
Tracking and Restitution of Stolen Cultural Goods
-
Stages for Measure
regarding Tracking and Restitution of Stolen Cultural Goods
-
Acquiring Permit of
Measure from our Country Judicial Authorities
-
Announcement of the Case
to the Interpol of the Country to which the Stolen Case Entered for
its Discovery & Restitution
6)
Investigation of Offences
Against Property & the Person in Abroad
7)
Information Exchange with
the World Countries Police during 24 Hours
8)
Prosecution of Criminals
Worldwide in the Framework of the Determined Rules
9)
Prosecution & Tracking
the Foreign Criminals
___________________________________
Article
Contractual & Tortious Civil Liability
Regarding the Court Jurisdiction
Fereidoun Nahreini, Attorney-At-Law
In
this article, the difference of two types of contractual and
tortuous civil liability is studied from viewpoint of the competent
court. We are going to see if the type of civil liability,
contractual and non-contractual, does affect on the courts
jurisdiction or not?
There is no doubt that the main discussion is within the limits of
the courts’ domestic jurisdiction, otherwise this subject will not
apply concerning the inherent jurisdiction except in the special
cases that it may cause change according to the legal structure and
type of liability which will be studied further.
First Part: Difference regarding Legal and Criminal Aspects
First Chapter: Jurisdiction of Court of Law
Second Chapter: Jurisdiction of Criminal Court
Second Part: Difference regarding the Domestic (Relative)
Jurisdiction of Courts
First Chapter: Jurisdiction of Court of Residence of the Defendant
Second Chapter: Jurisdiction of Court of Place of Contract
Conclusion & the Place of Carrying out of the Obligation
___________________________________
Article
A Criticism on Form of a Deed: Attorney
in Signature
Written by: Parviz Rezaei
By
using deed of attorney in signature, the attorney has merely right
to sign the registered deed as a result this power of attorney is a
work power of attorney (so it is exempted from payment of amounts
which should be paid in drawing up of sale power of attorney such as
tax, registration fee etc.)
This
articles deals with the fact that is this deed under title of
attorney in signature different from the common deed in notary
public offices under title of sale power of attorney or not? Or are
both naturally same regarding the registration regulations and
legally?
The
writer believes that in spite of apparent differences and the two
different titles, both deeds have a unique nature and there is no
cause for their difference at least regarding the registration
regulations. |