|
Editor in
Chief’s Note
Dear Attorney General
Respectfully, this is to inform that the Division for Collection of
Judgments in Education Department of Justice Administration of
Tehran Province has come across conflicting decisions in different
subjects during study and selection of the holdings:
- Hearing a claim for binding one to draw up a deed to transfer a
mortgaged property
■ Necessity of issuance of previous written notice from a health
director in a health infringement
■ Judicial affirming a donation in an ordinary document
■ Legality of claim for damages in excess of blood money
■ Possibility of appeal against a writ of abandonment of prosecution
■ Criminality of measures of a joint estate partner in sale of his
part of property
■ Different inferences of The Tenant and The Landlord Act 1997: if a
contact of lease is not signed by two witnesses, the legal relations
of the parties are subject to The Tenant and the Landlord Act 1977
or The Tenant and The Landlord Act 1997
■ Jurisdiction of Public Courts in hearing disputes of the
governmental organizations in contracts with an arbitration clause.
■ Necessity of submission of a claim for damages for returning the
property obtained from the crime of breach of trust
■ Possibility of appeal against holdings for smuggling goods and
foreign currency
■ Possibility of appeal against the court’s decisions in objection
of a third party to enforcement process
■ Are fracture of tibia and fibula bones, considered as one fracture
and only one blood money is payable or does each one have separate
blood money?
■ Possibility of appeal against the court decisions during the
execution of judgment
■ Possibility of rendering judgment to deliver the property sold by
an ordinary document
■ Implicit abolishment of The Law for Amendment of Law for
Prevention of Forcible Occupation 1973
■ Legality of rendering a judgment for eviction of the tenant due to
unauthorized change of occupation in case the breach related to the
change is done by transferee.
■ Possibility of re-trial regarding restitution of procedure the
writs issued from the court
■ Whether the lapse of time is applicable in an involuntary
manslaughter caused by a driving accident
■ Possibility of appeal regarding the court’s decision for sale of a
real estate held in common
■ Hearing an action for affirming the ownership of real estate on
the basis of ordinary document without requesting the court to
oblige one to draw up deed of transfer.
■ Necessity of ordering the return of property in offense of theft
Deputy in Education of Justice Administration of Tehran Province
A Selection of Latest Legal Approvals
■ Decisions of Executive Board of Legal Advisors, Attorneys and
Experts Affairs of the Judiciary are objectionable. (Verdict of
Administrative Justice Court - Gazette No. 18788 dated Sept. 1,
2009)
■ Sending copy of documents of the case to the Judiciary in case of
request of heirs of a murdered person for execution of retaliation
or limb defect (Gazette No. 18788 dated Sept. 1, 2009)
■ Articles of the Law for State Animal Husbandry Comprehensive
System (Gazette No. 18784 dated Aug. 27, 2009)
■ Causing nuisance for Teacher’s House and Education Dept. by a
government employee is not considered as an official violation.
(Verdict of Administrative Justice Court - Gazette No. 18812 dated
Sept. 30, 2009)
■ According to religious rules increasing marriage portion is not
permitted after marriage and to consider the effects of marriage
portion for it, is considered contrary to religious frameworks.
(Verdict of Administrative Justice Court - Gazette No. 18809 dated
Sept. 27, 2009)
■ Executive bylaw of The Law for Amendment of Article (18) of Law
for Establishment of Public and Revolutionary Courts Jan. 14, 2007
(Gazette No. 18832 dated Oct. 25, 2009)
Disciplinary Warnings
in decisions of The Judges’ Disciplinary Courts & Public
Prosecutor’s Office
■ Making the legal service of the sentence upon convicted inmate
after serving the imprisonment
■ Disciplinary Violation of the commenting assistant prosecutor:
agreement with the writ and a defective decision
■ Ordering a three-day detention of the chief clerk of justice
administration is not of the instances of breach of the court.
One Vote
One Experience
Dismissal of the Action of Ashraf Pahlavi by Court of First
Instance, Court of appeals and the Supreme Court in 1960
Around the Table
The following questions were discussed in the round table, and the
commission’s majority or unanimity of votes is as follows:
418- Is Note 3 of Article 5 of Law for Aggravation of Punishment of
Bribery and Embezzlement and Fraud 1988 of the Expediency
Council applicable by virtue of Clause 2 of Article 30 of Islamic
Criminal Law?
Opinion of nearly the unanimity of the members in the session dated
Mar. 12, 2009
Note 3 of Article 5 of Law for Aggravation of Punishment of Bribery
and Embezzlement and Fraud 1988 of the Expediency Council can be
applied in case the conditions inserted in it are materialized, that
is the property, subject of embezzlement is returned before issuance
of bill of indictment, in this case Clause 2 of Article 30 of
Islamic Criminal Law will not prevent applying and execution of the
mentioned note.
419- According to Article 17 of Legal Bill of Independence of the
Bar Association, can the court, in the position of rendering
judgment to supplementary punishment, suspend or prohibit attorney
of his work?
Opinion of Majority of the members in the session dated Mar. 12,
2009
Hearing the disciplinary violation of the attorneys-at-law,
according to their special occupation and position, is separate from
the justice administration organization and the competent authority
for investigation of their violations is the disciplinary court
located at the bar, as per Article 17 of Legal Bill of Independence
of the Bar Association because the prescription of the mentioned
article remains in force and on the other hand it is a special rule,
so the following public rule in Article 19 of Islamic Criminal Law
cannot abolish the former particular one. Moreover the narrow
interpretation rule of Criminal Laws demands applying Article 17 of
the Legal Bill and negating the application of Article 19 of Islamic
Criminal Law regarding the subject. Therefore, the criminal public
courts of justice administration, in investigation of violations of
an attorney and rendering judgment of conviction in the intentional
crimes, cannot condemn the attorney as a supplementary or deterrent
punishment to suspension or prohibition of the attorneyship even for
a certain term.
Selection of World Legal News
■ ICC upholds charges against accused DRC rebel leader
■ Thailand court sentences political activist to 18 years for royal
defamation
■ Spain judge indicts alleged Nazi guards
■ France ex-PM goes on trial for Sarkozy defamation
■ American soldier, criminal in Iraq, was convicted to life
imprisonment.
■ Order of detention of Ex-President of Venezuela
■ INTERPOL ex-president pleads not guilty at South Africa corruption
trial
■ Britannia Court: Torture evidence of Guantanamo suspected is to be
published.
Foreign Part
Judicial Education in India
This is the third part of this article which is allotted to the
following cases:
- The courses transferred by judicial education plans
- Non-university judicial supreme education
- Educational plan for judges of the province courts
1) Judicial authorities behavior methods in and outside the court
2) Civil legal procedure
3) Criminal legal procedure
4) Law of evidence
5) Administrative affairs
- Compiled law education for the judges of the province courts –
Munsiffs recently appointed
- Chief Topics
1- Civil
2- Criminal
3- General
The Month’s Guest
129th Session of Commission
Lecture of Mr. Mir Mohammad Sadeghi, Ph.D.
The subject of this session is about money laundering. It is more
than one year that we have jointed to the circle of countries
holding money laundering law. What is the reason of criminology of
money laundering and why there is considered a punishment for it?
How can we confront money laundering? It is a new phenomenon from
1980s, in which such act was began to be criminalized. Based on five
preconditions, money laundering can be punished and criminalized.
Crime is the great problem of human today. According to the
statistics presented by the UN several years ago, crime annual
growth is amounting to 5% and this can be compared with some of the
other figures such as population growth which fewer. Therefore, the
phenomenon and the problem is increasing and it is concluded that
from among all the calamities that bother humanity in the last
decades of 20th century, the most troubling problem is crime which
is more important than calamities such as incurable diseases or
environmental pollution and other issues. What is adding to the
dimensions of the problem is two particulars of crime:
1- Being organized and that today we rarely encounter the individual
criminality and the criminalities are organized.
2- Transnationality of the phenomenon of crime
Historical
This part is an interview with Ayatollah Mousavi Ardabili who was of
the Revolution activists before victory of the movement and of the
high-ranking authorities of the Regime after the Islamic Revolution.
There is an approval in the Judiciary for holding an exhibition to
keep the Judiciary services during these 30 years and these services
can be shown as far as possible. The first decade after the
Revolution in all fields is very remarkable.
He states that: «After the Islamic Revolution, we dissolved the
former Judiciary completely and elected some judges and appointed
them again. Then we reviewed the judgments but they were not precise
and the defects were not removed. Concerning establishment of the
Revolutionary Court, we thought by that procedure and the available
laws, the anti-revolution and cells accused could not be convicted
and this was a new subject. So we decided another organization and
order to be established. We invited the Revolutionary judges. But
unfortunately despite of our opinion for having codified laws, it
did not materialize and the general problems were due to lack of new
codified laws.
Article 2
Legal Analysis of Several Awards of the Board of Arbitration
Mohaddeseh Fereidoun
Expert of Economic Law & Secretariat of Board of Arbitration
Violations occurred in the capital market are divided into three
groups of crime, offense and dispute and by virtue of Stock Exchange
Law of the Islamic Republic of Iran 2005, investigation of dispute
of this part is within jurisdiction of Board of Arbitration.
According to Article 36 of Stock Exchange Law, disputes between
agents, investment counselors, publishers, investors and other
activists concerning their professional activities, in case do not
lead to compromise in the related part, is investigated by Board of
Arbitration. It should be mentioned that investigation in Board of
Arbitration is compulsory, that is, its investigation is different
from optional arbitration prescribed in the civil procedure.
Article 37 of Stock Exchange Law, regarding combination of the Board
of Arbitration, reads: «The board of arbitration includes three
members, one is elected by the Chief of the Judiciary from among the
experienced judges and two from experts in the economic and
financial fields by suggestion of the organization and confirmation
of the council investigate the disputes. Chief of the Judiciary and
the organization, each one elect alternate member by confirmation of
council in addition to their principal members to act the absence of
related principal member. Conditions of alternate member are same as
principal member.
As per the note of the same article, presidency of the Board of
Arbitration is undertaken by the representative of the Judiciary.
Therefore, the principal or alternate member appointed by Chief of
the Judiciary undertakes presidency of Board of Arbitration and the
issues related to investigation of each case.
Investigation of the cases in the Board depends on failing the
parties to the dispute to compromise in associations according to
Article 36 of Stock Exchange Law. The association issues an
incompatibility certificate after holding a session for dispute
settlement and failing to achieve result and the certificate is one
of the steps for setting forth the case in Board of Arbitration.
Jurisdiction of Board of Arbitration is an inherent jurisdiction
based on law and is separated from jurisdiction of the public courts
despite of the fact that the latter are authorities of general
jurisdiction. Hence, the writ of non-jurisdiction by the public
court and refuses to hear the case is confirmed by the Supreme Court
and the case is referred to Board of Arbitration. In the meantime,
jurisdiction of the Board of Arbitration is a legal jurisdiction and
the investigation is limited merely to the legal cases (disputes)
and the claim is proved and damages are awarded to be paid. So it
has no criminal or disciplinary jurisdiction.
According to the Note 5 of Article 37 of Stock Exchange Law, awards
of the Board of Arbitration are final and binding on the parties and
cannot be reviewed and their enforcement is undertaken by execution
departments of state organization for registration of deeds and real
estate.
After explanation about role and place of Board of Arbitration, two
samples of the rendered verdicts by this authority about transaction
of stocks made by one on behalf of another without the latter’s
permit, and the analysis and study are mentioned based on legal
rules.
Article
Fixing Broken Windows
Leila Dadkhodaei
Assistant Prosecutor of Public Prosecutor’s Office
Theory of fixing broken windows handles with the fact that the first
disorder should be confronted and the first broken window should be
fixed but it has not been explicitly mentioned that what we can do
to prevent the first window to be broken.
And that means a campaign, the effect fighting against beggars and
tramps will not remove the poverty, and as far as poverty exists,
there are the problems resulted from it. Another important note that
is ignored in the theory of broken windows, is attention to the role
of crime as a safety valve and its positive function.
It should be mentioned that deviation and crime are not always
necessarily negative. Sometimes, existence of disorder and
abnormality, and in the higher level, crime, causes protection of
society and guarantee for keeping the order and the main norms. So
inevitably to keep a main and high value, the execution of law with
lower value can be ignored and if by a small deviation and disorder,
astray and perverted individuals are confronted, not only the
ugliness of crime and deviation is removed, but also another higher
value will not be felt in this classification from viewpoint of
citizens to be bound in comparison with other values, rather it will
make people dare to violate it. So priority in election and
execution of law is of the most important issues in criminology and
criminal policy.
Article
Study of Appeals against Awards of Narcotic-Related Crimes in Iran
Criminal Law and its Comparison with France Criminal Law
Jahanbakhsh Hassanzadeh
Head of Islamic Revolution Court of City of Amol
Regarding appeal against the awards of narcotic-related crimes,
since public prosecutor’s offices and revolutionary courts are
subject to the general rules of Criminal Procedure, therefore all
the writs issued in relation to narcotics can be reviewed within the
framework of regulations of Criminal Procedure and Amendment Law for
Law of Establishment of Public and Revolutionary Courts (Public
Prosecutor’s Offices Revival Law). But regarding judgments, it
should be admitted that by virtue of Article 32 of Amendment Law for
Narcotics Control Law, the judgments rendered about narcotics are
final and binding, except for execution sentences that are to be
confirmed by Head of Supreme Court or Attorney-General. It should be
mentioned that confirmation of death penalty by the above two
authorities cannot be considered as revision, because this measure
is not in conformity with any of the methods of objection to
judgments, rather it is a legal obligation which is mentioned in
Article 32 of the law and the court should act regarding this
obligation. But in the Criminal Law of France about appeal of
narcotics decisions including judgments and writs, it should be
noted that they are subject to general rules of Criminal Procedure
and can be re-heard such as the other crimes. Also Article 32 of the
above-mentioned law has considered Attorney-General as the authority
who should confirm the execution punishment, whereas public
prosecutor is considered as a party to the suit and cannot render
judgment. Therefore, Attorney-General cannot confirm the execution
sentence and this is a defect of the legislator. So it is suggested
that the legislator pays attention to the point and amends Narcotics
Control Law. In the meantime, as to the finality of judgments of
narcotics, concerning the principle of fair judgment and rights of
the defendant, it is recommended that Narcotics Control Law is
revised and amended and at least, punishments of life and long-term
imprisonments and heavy fines be revised.
Article
The Survey of Divorce Incidence Factors in Divorce Applicants in
Tehran
Divorce is among the most sorrowful and its social phenomena, the
damages and problems are sustained by the spouses and their families
before and after divorce and the effective factors of this
phenomenon have been studied since a longtime ago. Unfortunately,
numerous studies in our country show that divorce incidents are
increasing. Divorce has many reasons and one only reason cannot be
considered as a main reason of it. Divorce has many consequences
that if we can prevent its factors and reasons, we can be free from
the problematic consequences of divorce. According to the importance
of the subject we have decided to study the main reasons of divorce
so that an appropriate technique is considered for its decrease.
This article has studied the factors causing divorce request in the
divorce applicants in Family Courts of Tehran (Shahid Mahallati –
Vanak) during 2006-2007. The sample group is inclusive of 300. The
results have shown that the most important reasons of divorce are
respectively incompatibility and misunderstanding, violence and
sexual problems. The results show that divorce has different reasons
and dimensions, the rate of which can be decreased by precise
identification of its reason and necessary planning in these fields,
specially with setting forth in the consulting sessions before
marriage as well as necessity of informing spouses in specialized
consultation during appearance of the problem. |